For Real Estate Brokers
Common inspection issues in Illinois attorney review
What inspection findings actually move the needle on attorney-review negotiations: roof, HVAC, electrical, plumbing, structural, environmental.
Not every inspection finding triggers significant attorney-review negotiation. The findings that actually move money — the ones that prompt repair demands, credits, or termination — cluster in predictable categories. Brokers, buyers, and sellers benefit from knowing the patterns.
Roof
Common findings: aging asphalt shingles approaching end of life, missing or damaged shingles, flashing failures, deteriorated valleys, ice-dam damage in Chicago-area homes, gutter and downspout issues.
Negotiation pattern: partial replacement vs. full replacement; credit vs. repair; whether the buyer accepts the remaining roof life and adjusts price. Roof issues frequently trigger the largest dollar-impact inspection-response demands.
HVAC
Common findings: end-of-life furnace or AC unit, deferred maintenance, ductwork issues, hot-water heater nearing replacement age, indoor air-quality concerns.
Negotiation pattern: service-life remaining vs. immediate replacement; credit vs. repair; whether the seller's home warranty will cover failures within the post-closing year.
Electrical
Common findings: aluminum wiring (1960s-70s homes), knob-and-tube wiring (pre-1950s homes), undersized service panel, missing GFCI outlets in required locations, double-tapped breakers, exterior service issues.
Negotiation pattern: safety-critical findings (knob-and-tube, double-tapped breakers) typically require correction before closing; cosmetic findings (missing GFCI in some locations) can usually be resolved with credit. Insurance carriers may also require certain corrections, which forces seller action.
Plumbing
Common findings: galvanized supply lines (ferrous corrosion), polybutylene supply lines, lead service lines (Chicago-area pre-1986 homes), sewer line condition (especially in older Chicago neighborhoods), main shut-off valve, water-pressure issues.
Negotiation pattern: lead service lines are an increasingly significant issue in Chicago given Lead Service Line Replacement Notification Act disclosure requirements; sewer line condition often requires camera inspection for full evaluation; major repairs often handled by credit rather than seller-completed work.
Structural
Common findings: foundation cracks (especially in older Chicago homes with brick foundations), settlement, joist or beam concerns, attic structure issues, deck and porch structural deficiencies.
Negotiation pattern: structural findings frequently require structural-engineer follow-up before negotiation can proceed. The negotiation often pauses while the engineer's report is obtained. Major findings can be deal-breakers.
Environmental
Common findings: radon testing results above 4 pCi/L, asbestos-containing materials in older homes, mold (visible or HVAC-distributed), underground oil storage tanks (rural and former-rural Chicago-area properties), lead paint.
Negotiation pattern: radon mitigation systems are typically credit-resolvable ($1,500-$2,500 typical mitigation cost); asbestos and mold can require professional remediation that the seller declines to handle, which shifts the deal economics; oil tanks are sometimes deal-breakers depending on contamination evaluation.
How Adam handles inspection-response negotiations
Adam personally handles every inspection-response negotiation. The work involves reading the inspection report carefully, identifying findings that warrant action vs. findings that are noise, drafting a calibrated demand, and negotiating with the other side's attorney to reach an outcome both sides can live with.
The goal is rarely 'win every demand' — it's 'get the right outcomes on the items that matter, and let the noise go.' The approach focuses negotiations on material issues while avoiding unnecessary escalation.
Continue reading
Start here